Need a set of eagle eyes for TZ670 Address Objects
Larry
All-Knowing Sage ✭✭✭✭
Manually created a slew of Address Objects for a new TZ670 and divvied them up to two Address Groups.
I went to add those two Address Groups to a GAV Exclusions Group and got the following error message:
Here is the complete list of 24 Address Objects (two screenshots).
I've looked this list over several times and I cannot tell what is overlapping that the device would squawk about.
The reason I'm asking here, rather than calling support, is because the device is not registered and is not online. And I can't register it until January 2023, when it needs to be delivered (very long story, but budget related).
So if anyone can spot where this is falling down, I'd appreciate it.
The original TZ600 has been operating with the same Address Objects and Groups for years, and there was no reported conflict there.
Thanks!
Answers
@Larry "Datto Backup Cloud Server" resolves to 8.34.176.158 and conflicts with "Datto Portal"?
--Michael@BWC
@BWC - yes it does. But shouldn't that alert have hit when I added them to the Datto BCDR Group? I mean, they are both in that one group - and there is an overlap. As they are in the TZ600.
Funny it should holler an error about the BCDR Group and the Common Group. That doesn't make any sense.
So I removed the FQDN from the BCDR group. It successfully gets added to the GAV Exclusions Group.
However, when I try to add the Datto Common Group to GAV Exclusions Group, I get the overlap message.
The Common group only has NTP entries, so I am very confused.
Hi @Larry
Could you share groups member details via group tab
You, sir, win this one.
Somehow - and I still haven't figured this out - the Common Group was included in the BCDR Group. When I tried to add the Common Group of course it was going to say there was a conflict.
Thanks!
Glad to hear your problem is solved👍️