Comments
-
Excatly. So far I have heard three completely different "theories" about what's going on. Each of them having very different consequences and each of them prompting the need for different actions on our side. The communication form Sonicwall so far doesn't enable us to understand what's happening and what has to be done.
-
@scottybud I still don't see the "scenario" we're getting at. If what you say is true (client software has been trojanized) this would mean that there isn't actually a vulnerability on the firewall that can be mitigated by deactivating VPN. It would mean that potentially millions of Client-PCs are infected and have to get…
-
@Terri "My understanding from this is that firewalls are only impacted if they are using NetExtender 10.x. The linked KB gives some initial mitigation options for that scenario." Well, but NetExtender is a client software that runs on the user's computers, not on the firewall. So the firewall is never using any version of…
-
Would be nice if the article would be updated with information that is actually useful. Currently it's a rather unclear and in parts self-contradictory mess. It's urgent that admins get more detailed information about what's actually going on in order to understand the scope of the issue and act accordingly. At the moment…
-
This "security notice" leaves pretty much all the questions open that should come to the mind of any admin reading it. It's neither clear what the issue is nor which products are affected. The wording seems to be self-contradictory. The notice, as it currently is, doesn't make much sense at all, actually. We need…