Menu

electromojo

Newbie ✭
Default Avatar

Join the Conversation

To sign in, use your existing MySonicWall account. To create a free MySonicWall account click "Register".

Sign In Register

electromojo Newbie ✭

Badges (2)

Name DropperFirst Comment
See More

Reactions

0 Promote 0 Helpful 0 Like 0 Spam 0 Abuse

Comments

  • Some news with further testing. Running iperf in UDP mode with @TKWITS command yielded same results. Same results with lower encryption suggested by @JackBurton. Traceroute between WANs indicates traffic never leaves ISP between sites but lots of latency. Got me thinking so I setup a iperf port forward to test over WAN…
    in Site to Site VPN - expected performance? Comment by electromojo September 13
  • @Arkwright yes, basic SpeedTest.net tests. For all testing I am doing it far afterhours for both offices so I am likely the only bandwidth user (remote control into the pair of workstations). Thanks for your help so far. I'm surprised at the iPerf results too. Something I'm missing here. @TKWITS iPerf3 was run as default.…
    in Site to Site VPN - expected performance? Comment by electromojo September 11
  • Internet is great at both sites. No complaints from staff: Don't have App Visualization license and using SonicOS 6.5.4 but Live Monitor shows CPU going from 0% to 2% and about 100 new connections during iPerf. I am currently not onsite at either location so doing these tests remotely while offices are closed. I am closer…
    in Site to Site VPN - expected performance? Comment by electromojo September 11
  • Thanks for your reply. Here is the iPerf results. Seems to be worse.
    in Site to Site VPN - expected performance? Comment by electromojo September 11