SonicAdmin80 Cybersecurity Overlord ✭✭✭
Comments
-
Yes, it sounds like a critical update but they provide only one day advance notification and no details about what the issues are and will it be published on the PSIRT website.
-
I understand that SonicWall statement to mean the usual, that directly going back to previous version isn’t supported. Not that it isn’t supported to reset to factory defaults with an earlier version and import a configuration backup from that earlier version. It’s even mentioned in this KB article: Unless there is some…
-
Maybe this doesn't come in to play when using regular interfaces and VLAN sub-interfaces. Perhaps it's more relevant when using VLAN trunking and link aggregation. I've never had the need to do trunking in SonicOS before, but I now have a use case for it so was researching this topic. I'll change the reserved VLAN range…
-
Propably something like that, I can see it now.
-
I can't see it in mysonicwall, was it pulled already or just isn't rolled out everywhere at the same time?
-
Hi @Gailand , you should have an email from yesterday with the subject "Downstream server inaccessible after update".
-
RA not working after the update, hopefully Gailand is working today.
-
@BWC Great, I'll do the same.
-
@BWC Has it been working fine since then?
-
@BWC 😂 Indeed, limitless vulnerabilities. At least here they say "NOTE: Upgrade from v10.2.0.x to v10.2.1.7 is supported": https://www.sonicwall.com/support/knowledge-base/upgrade-path-for-sma100-series/190314100423452/ So perhaps the update fixes the issue but who knows since right below it they say "Follow the KB Safe…
-
I started seeing login attempts last week. I read the SonicWall blog but I didn't think it or the email notification gave the matter the urgency it should have. So I haven't updated yet since it didn't seem too bad. Is this the new way SonicWall is going to handle critical security issues? Bury them in marketing and…
-
I'm considering trying out Enhanced Filtering for Connectors, to see if it would fill some of the gaps that Email Security leaves, allowing occasionally phishing messages to go through. Has anyone tried it out in the last two years? What's the official SonicWall stance, is SCL -1 rule still the recommended installation…
-
I don't think that would work as that's routing over multiple interfaces or gateways, not utilizing multiple X1 IP addresses for outgoing traffic which would require NAT anyway. The trouble is that Microsoft sometimes throttles my Email Security IP addresses. And If I recall, Email Security always uses the primary IP…
-
Thanks!
-
@BWC Good thing we have you as a beta tester, as SonicWall don't seem to have them.