Comments
-
The Cisco CBS (Cisco Business Series), which was initially named Catalyst 1000 series, is what I've been moving to. Definitely not ubiquiti cheap, but reasonably affordable (big picture-wise), and their official storefront is via Amazon. So far I haven't had any issues getting anything. (Fingers crossed).
-
@Arkwright I am not using x0. I read that when I first set it up, but other resources said that using x0 wasn't a necessity since you can choose your HA data+managment interfaces. Yes, the single WAN switch is a single point of failure for now, but the reason I went with the model I did is because they do stack. The second…
-
Right, but that could just be one device that randomizes its MAC address every time it connects to the network.
-
@RTTCV What do you do about nearly all modern phones/tablets generating a random MAC every time they connect to a network?
-
ugh. Here all these years with SonicWall I jus thought I couldn't find it. Good to know that it doesn't exist so we can figure something else out.
-
What is the point of adding the UDM? If you're just looking for a UNIFI controller, there's way better ways to accomplish that.
-
Yes. Purchase the NSv firewall licens(s) and set one up. For whatever reason, there's no NFR zero-cost virtual firewall like EVERY OTHER BRAND offers.
-
You need one 242 option string on your data vlan that tells the phones to switch vlans, and then a second 242 option string on your voice vlan to tell the phones the important info. Example: data vlan/LAN zone: L2Q=1,L2QVLAN=10,VLANTEST=0 Voice vlan( vlan10)/VOICE zone:…
-
I run a distributed call center across many VPN tunnels with nearly zero issues.
-
Any updates? It really is unprofessional to have the marketing junk on the login page.
-
Ugh. This is going to take weeks, and honestly isn't the best resolution. I mentioned VPNs, but even if I scan locally (10.10.10.1-10.10.10.254 for example), I will get a return for every IP in that subnet, even though there's no inside device with that IP leased. What a pain! Other vendors have a "Block RFC1918 on WAN…
-
That would be a nightmare to keep up with, considering there's a dozen or so different subnets across each site to site VPN tunnel. Basically the entire 10.0.0.0/8 subnet and 172.16.0.0/16 subnets will respond from every address in those subnets from my WAN connections on this one ISP. It's all their equipment. I've hit…
-
If the long-term plan is to replace the existing circuit, I'd get it plugged in and migrated ASAP.
-
I don't know of a way to do it without NAT.
-
My 470s Beg to differ. They're max 2.5gbps SFP ports.