Join the Conversation

To sign in, use your existing MySonicWall account. To create a free MySonicWall account click "Register".

Reduced Throughput with DPI-SSL

2»

Comments

  • Halon5Halon5 Enthusiast ✭✭

    Hi @BWC ,

    My thoughts exactly! I couldn't have put it better myself.

    Still love the SonicWALL devices for the zoned "separation".

    ---Steph.

  • xdmfanboyxdmfanboy Newbie ✭

    The TZ 400 is dramatically faster in the real world than the TZ 300, for not much more money. The TZ 300 struggles with DPI-SSL even in smaller networks. The 400 has almost the performance of the 500, yet almost the price of the 300. The 300 is discontinued, but I wouldn't even buy the 350 for anything but the smallest installations if DPI-SSL is required.

  • Halon5Halon5 Enthusiast ✭✭

    Well I just had my DPI-SSL case closed out of the blue with no explanation. :(

  • BWCBWC Cybersecurity Overlord ✭✭✭

    @Halon,

    that means it is fixed and we can all scan happily ever after ... wait what?

    Maybe DPI-SSL will get another try in SonicOS 7, does anybody know if this part will rewritten as well?

    --Michael@BWC

Sign In or Register to comment.