Latency on Gen7

BWC

Hi all,

does someone experienced a higher latency on Gen7 devices?

While having my first steps on a TZ 670 I saw that a ping to the appliance from LAN goes from 0.5 to as high as 9ms. The unit is just sitting there, doing nothing, I'am not even logged in to it.

A NSa 2650 or NSA 3500 (for the silver surfers) is responding like any other local device with a <0.3ms even when operating.

Will do further tests.

--Michael@BWC

preston

Hi @BWC I also noticed this was happening as soon as we started on the beta with the TZ570W it also does it on the NSa2700 interfaces, but if you ping a device through it you get the expected results, it could be that maybe the new OS7 is prioritising the other traffic over the Management traffic

Saravanan

Hi @BWC,

I'll have this tested and update you here.

BWC

Hi @preston

that sounds OK to me, maybe it's related to this ODP/OFP wizardry in the background, who knows.

--Michael@BWC

BWC

Like @preston pointed out in the other Thread about the 7.0.1-5050 Release, the latency while pinging the Firewall went away, took SNWL only 1 1/4 years 🤣

7.0.1-5030
64 bytes from 10.x.y.z: icmp_seq=25 ttl=64 time=0.464 ms
64 bytes from 10.x.y.z: icmp_seq=26 ttl=64 time=3.749 ms
64 bytes from 10.x.y.z: icmp_seq=27 ttl=64 time=8.030 ms
64 bytes from 10.x.y.z: icmp_seq=28 ttl=64 time=6.734 ms
64 bytes from 10.x.y.z: icmp_seq=29 ttl=64 time=1.269 ms

7.0.1-5050
64 bytes from 10.x.y.z: icmp_seq=419 ttl=128 time=0.358 ms
64 bytes from 10.x.y.z: icmp_seq=420 ttl=128 time=0.351 ms
64 bytes from 10.x.y.z: icmp_seq=421 ttl=128 time=0.264 ms
64 bytes from 10.x.y.z: icmp_seq=422 ttl=128 time=0.423 ms
64 bytes from 10.x.y.z: icmp_seq=423 ttl=128 time=0.316 ms

There might be hope after all.

--Michael@BWC

Larry

@BWC - Hmmm, maybe that's what they mean when they use the word "boundless."

ThK

https://community.sonicwall.com/technology-and-support/discussion/comment/10744#Comment_10744