Comments
-
Just posting to say it is still a thing... 😁
-
Thank you @Nat. I've followed the steps in the documentation you linked. The issue is that it doesn't match an internal IP with it's matching external IP. It is a dynamic matching and not a static one. I have multiple VMs hosting websites, e-mail, etc., each with their own external IP associated with their internal IP. The…
-
O.k. so after researching I came back to Sonicwall. Got a TZ 370. I'm in the process of setting it up. Still trying to do a Many 1:1. The current firewall has this after creating the objects My_Statics and My_Internals_IPs: Since the documentation is incorrect, and you say it can be done, how do I do this with the TZ 370?…
-
Thank you Michael@BWC. Found it and it is updated.
-
Hello. I just set up my first Policy Access Rule and I'm getting the same message. The firmware version is SonicOS 7.0.0-R906 and it says it is current. What do I do now?
-
@Nat - I wasn't mentioning Match Object. The documentation was mentioning it. I was only repeating what I saw in the documentation. Please see: SonicOSX 7 Rules and Policies - Creating a Many-to-Many NAT Policy - SonicWall Thank you for letting me know that Many-to-Many NAT doesn't need a license/use Match Object unlike…
-
Michael@BWC According to this documentation, SonicOSX 7 Rules and Policies - Creating a Many-to-Many NAT Policy - SonicWall that is what is supposed to be done. Are you saying the documentation is wrong? I don't see anywhere in my questions where it could be taken as a demand. Sorry you saw it that way. This is moot…